UVA Researchers on Harvard Dataverse

This dataverse collection contains datasets harvested from UVa Affiliated Authors who have Datasets on Harvard's Dataverse repository

Featured Dataverses

In order to use this feature you must have at least one published or linked dataverse.

Publish Dataverse

Are you sure you want to publish your dataverse? Once you do so it must remain published.

Publish Dataverse

This dataverse cannot be published because the dataverse it is in has not been published.

Delete Dataverse

Are you sure you want to delete your dataverse? You cannot undelete this dataverse.

141 to 150 of 243 Results

Replication Data for "Visualizing Inequality: How Graphical Emphasis Shapes Public Opinion" Apr 14, 2025 Hughes, Adam, 2025, "Replication Data for "Visualizing Inequality: How Graphical Emphasis Shapes Public Opinion"", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/V5CGTS These files allow researchers to reproduce the results included in "Visualizing Inequality: How Graphical Emphasis Shapes Public Opinion," published in Research and Politics. The Stata .do file contains code for all analysis presented in both the main text and the supplemental appendix. This Dataset is harvested from our partners. Clicking the link will take you directly to the archival source of the data.
Replication Data for: Slow-Rolling, Fast-Tracking, and the Pace of Bureaucratic Decisions in Rulemaking Apr 14, 2025 Potter, Rachel Augustine, 2025, "Replication Data for: Slow-Rolling, Fast-Tracking, and the Pace of Bureaucratic Decisions in Rulemaking", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/1O8LCD Data and code to replicate all results in the published paper. This Dataset is harvested from our partners. Clicking the link will take you directly to the archival source of the data.
Replication data for: Ratliff & Nosek (2011): Negativity and outgroup biases in attitude formation and transfer. Apr 14, 2025 Kate Ratliff; Brian Nosek, 2025, "Replication data for: Ratliff & Nosek (2011): Negativity and outgroup biases in attitude formation and transfer.", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/FEGAMO Two studies used an illusory correlation procedure to test whether distinct implicit and explicit evaluations could result from the same learning episode. All participants learned twice as much about the qualities of one group (majority) than another (minority). In one condition, the ratio of positive to negative information was equal between group... This Dataset is harvested from our partners. Clicking the link will take you directly to the archival source of the data.
Replication Data for: Getting Time Right: Using Cox Models and Probabilities to Interpret Binary Panel Data Apr 14, 2025 Metzger, Shawna; Jones, Benjamin, 2025, "Replication Data for: Getting Time Right: Using Cox Models and Probabilities to Interpret Binary Panel Data", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/FEW2JP Replication material for Metzger and Jones' "Getting Time Right" (forthcoming, Political Analysis). See "readme.html" in /code folder for further documentation. The CO capsule does not rerun the main simulations, but does provide the raw simulation results from those simulations. Abstract: Logit and probit (L/P) models are a mainstay of binary ti... This Dataset is harvested from our partners. Clicking the link will take you directly to the archival source of the data.
Replication data for: Smith and Nosek (2011): Affective Focus Increases Concordance between Implicit and Explicit Attitudes Apr 14, 2025 Colin Tucker Smith; Brian Nosek, 2011, "Replication data for: Smith and Nosek (2011): Affective Focus Increases Concordance between Implicit and Explicit Attitudes", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/IKHD0H, Brian Nosek Two attitude dichotomies – implicit versus explicit and affect versus cognition – are presumed to be related. Following a manipulation of attitudinal focus (affective or cognitive), participants completed two implicit measures (Implicit Association Test and the Sorting Paired Features task) and three explicit attitude measures toward cats/dogs (Stu... This Dataset is harvested from our partners. Clicking the link will take you directly to the archival source of the data.
Oceans of Kinfolk Database Apr 14, 2025 Williams, Jennie K., 2025, "Oceans of Kinfolk Database", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/E31O7Q In 1807, the US Congress enacted the "Act Prohibiting Importation of Slaves," which outlawed the nation’s participation in the transatlantic slave trade. This very same statute required any captain of a coastwise vessel with enslaved people onboard to file a manifest listing those individuals by name with the collector (or in his absence, the surve... This Dataset is harvested from our partners. Clicking the link will take you directly to the archival source of the data.
Replication data for: Militarized Compellent Threats, 1918-2001 Apr 14, 2025 Todd S. Sechser, 2025, "Replication data for: Militarized Compellent Threats, 1918-2001", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/VDJQ1E The study of military coercion is a central topic in international relations, and in recent years research on coercive threats has yielded a long list of important theoretical innovations. In 1960, Thomas Schelling drew a distinction between threats meant to deter and those designed to compel, but empirical research about coercion has paid much mor... This Dataset is harvested from our partners. Clicking the link will take you directly to the archival source of the data.
Ratliff & Nosek (2010): Creating distinct implicit and explicit attitudes with an illusory correlation paradigm Apr 14, 2025 Kate Ratliff; Brian Nosek, 2010, "Ratliff & Nosek (2010): Creating distinct implicit and explicit attitudes with an illusory correlation paradigm", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/YZB7DC, Brian Nosek Two studies used an illusory correlation procedure to test whether distinct implicit and explicit evaluations could result from the same learning episode. All participants learned twice as much about the qualities of one group (majority) than another (minority). In one condition, the ratio of positive to negative information was equal between group... This Dataset is harvested from our partners. Clicking the link will take you directly to the archival source of the data.
Nosek et al. (2009): National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement Apr 14, 2025 Brian Nosek, Fred Smyth + 23 co-authors, 2008, "Nosek et al. (2009): National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/9KEKQK, Brian Nosek About 70% of more than half a million Implicit Association Tests (IATs) completed by citizens of 34 countries revealed expected implicit stereotypes associating science with male more than with female. We discovered that nation-level implicit stereotype predicted nation-level sex differences in 8th-grade science and mathematics achievement. Self-re... This Dataset is harvested from our partners. Clicking the link will take you directly to the archival source of the data.
Legislative Effectiveness in the United States Senate Apr 14, 2025 wiseman, alan; volden, craig, 2025, "Legislative Effectiveness in the United States Senate", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/C2LWHA, The Journal of Politics Dataverse These are the stata dataset (version 11), stata .do, and codebook (microsoft word) files that are necessary to replicate the analysis and results in: Volden, Craig, and Alan E. Wiseman. "Legislative Effectiveness in the United States Senate" This Dataset is harvested from our partners. Clicking the link will take you directly to the archival source of the data.

Replication Data for "Visualizing Inequality: How Graphical Emphasis Shapes Public Opinion"

Apr 14, 2025

Hughes, Adam, 2025, "Replication Data for "Visualizing Inequality: How Graphical Emphasis Shapes Public Opinion"", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/V5CGTS

These files allow researchers to reproduce the results included in "Visualizing Inequality: How Graphical Emphasis Shapes Public Opinion," published in Research and Politics. The Stata .do file contains code for all analysis presented in both the main text and the supplemental appendix.